- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:52:17 -0500
- To: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>, WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Hi Amy, Your proposed text looks reasonable. I have a few editorial suggestions though: At 01:01 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Amelia A Lewis wrote: >. . . >Proposed text: > >Multiple inclusion of a single WSDL document MUST be resolved to a Change: "MUST be resolved" to "resolves". >single set of components. Mutual, multiple, and circular includes are >explicitly permitted, and do not represent multiple redefinitions of the >same components. Insert: "Multiple inclusion of a single WSDL document has the same meaning as including it only once." >Processors are encouraged to keep track of the source >of component definitions, so that multiple, mutual, and circular >includes do not require establishing identity component-by-component. It might be good to move the following to the beginning of the paragraph, to avoid the forward reference: >A >mutual include is direct inclusion by one WSDL document of another WSDL >document which includes the first. A circular include achieves the same >effect with greater indirection (WSDL A includes WSDL B includes WSDL A, >for instance). -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2003 10:56:54 UTC