- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:11:17 -0700
- To: "'Martin Gudgin'" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <012b01c309e5$440eb080$fffa000a@beasys.com>
Gudge, As I said in an earlier email, it is often the case that people need to KNOW whether the endpoints that implement the same interface in a service are equivalent to each other or not. There's currently no way of indicating that in WSDL, at least not that I know of. I suggested one simple way ( a special containment element for equivalent endpoints), but Sanjiva's approach is even simpler. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Martin Gudgin > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 2:47 PM > To: Sanjiva Weerawarana; www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: RE: proposal for restricting a service to a single interface > > > > I must confess to not really understanding the motivation behind this > proposal. It seems to me that people that want a service to implement > but a single interface can define such a service today using > our current > spec. And those that want a service to implement multiple > interfaces can > also do that today. I'm not sure why we would want to remove one of > these capabilities. > > Gudge > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > > Sent: 21 April 2003 23:40 > > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > > > > > Following up on the action item I have, I'd like to propose > > the following: > > > > - Require all <port>s within a <service> element to implement > > exactly the same interface. Thus, each <port> is an alternate > > implementation of the same interface. > > - The interface will be indicated with a new attribute: > > <service interface="qname"> ... </service> > > - As with any interface in WSDL 1.2, this interface could > > have extended any number of other interfaces. > > > > I will soon send the updated binding proposal which takes > > this into account to dramatically simplify the binding stuff. > > If this doesn't get accepted then I'll re-do the binding proposal. > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 18:08:51 UTC