- From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:01:35 -0700
- To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1 to Option 2a >Option 2a: Suggest but don't require defining semantics. Add something to >the spec along the lines of: > >"The targetNamespace URI represents an unambiguous name for the intended >semantics of the WSDL document. The targetNamespace URI SHOULD point to a >human or machine processable document that directly or indirectly defines >the semantics of the WSDL document." --Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: David Booth [mailto:dbooth@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:52 PM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: A modest proposal on WSDL semantics > > > I have drafted a brief, modest proposal for addressing semantics in WSDL > 1.2: > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wsdl-semantics-dbooth/semantics_clean.htm > I'm interested to hear whether people find this proposal reasonable. > > -- > David Booth > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2002 11:02:09 UTC