- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 06:17:33 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Dial in information (members only) [0]:
[0] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Oct/0037.html
See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is:
Steve Tuecke (fallbacks Don Wright, Amelia Lewis, Glen Daniels,
Dale Moberg, Pallavi Malu, Allen Brookes)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes of Oct 10 telcon [3]
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0081.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items.
? 2002-09-09: Sanjiva to redo part 3.2 of his binding proposal.
? 2002-09-10: Sanjiva to produce a proposal for equivalence of
(at least) top-level components in the next couple
of weeks.
? 2002-09-10: Gudge; jeffsch; roberto et al to write proposal
[to remove message and replace with complexType.]
? 2002-09-10: Gudge to provide summary of using xml schema to
wrap other type systems at an appropriate level
of abstraction.
? 2002-09-11: Jeffrey and Don define TCP binding.
? 2002-09-19: Joyce, Sandeep, Igor, Steve T, Sanjiva, Adi,
Roberto, Amy to form a task force to prepare
presenation about adding pub/sub in a first
class manner to WSDL 1.2.
? 2002-09-19: Sanjiva to write a Java binding.
DONE [4] 2002-10-03: Jeffrey to respond to comments on the Requirements
document.
? 2002-10-10: Gudge to roll port type inheritance into the
main branch, adding an issue that we need to
resolve the name issue and also the issue for
promoting operations to the top level.
? 2002-10-10: Gudge to prepare proposal for promoting operations.
? 2002-10-10: Roberto to see how this might affect the feature
proposal. Glen to review this.
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0041.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
4. FTF planning:
Jan FTF. Poll results are in [5] (Note my dates were off by one!)
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Oct/0031.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Requirements [6]
Resolutions to outstanding comments [7]. Please review the draft
response and be prepared to approve or start discussion on the
proposals. Especially note that R046 has two possible resolutions which
we will decide between.
No comments received yet from Arch or XForms.
[6]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/requirements/ws-desc-re
qs.html
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0041.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
6. New Issues
Attempt to clarify schema language extensibility [8]
"implements" attribute on Service [9]
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0040.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0064.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Importing Schema into WSDL [12]
Is there anything left to do with wsdl:include?
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0049.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Identification of a Service [14]
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Oct/0017.html
(members only)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Rationale for dropping the <soap:body use=...> attribute [15]
Proposal from Jacek on better describing the extensibility
mechanism to support other languages. [16]
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0054.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0040.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10. BindingType proposal from Kevin [17].
Awaiting further work on Part 2 AM.
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Aug/0009.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
11. A slice at a proposal for SOAP features/properties in WSDL [18].
Canon's change requests [19].
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0004.html
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0080.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 [20].
Jean-Jacques proposal at [21].
Jacek's addendum at [22].
Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.
[20] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x2
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0050.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0056.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 28: transport='uri' [23]
Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.
[23] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x28
--------------------------------------------------------------------
14. HTTP Binding Issues (6a, 41)
Jeffrey recommends no change [24].
Sanjiva is mulling this over [25].
Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0067.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model
Gudge's explains at [26], Roberto's options at [27].
Waiting for more detail in ACM?
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0186.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0071.html
- Jonathan
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 09:18:05 UTC