- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 07:21:34 -0700
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sanjiva, just to expand on what Gudge said: > Yeah, we talked on the call about working on the names later in the life > of the spec so that we can come up with a consistent set when things are > more stable. I suggested (and we seemed to have consensus on) that we postpone naming issues until the spec solidifies a bit more, and then have a thorough review of all the names at once. This should help us avoid spending a lot of time arguing about names of constructs that might change or disappear later, and help us to craft a consistent naming strategy. So, for now, the names are up to the editors. Hope you find this an efficient way to go forward.
Received on Monday, 14 October 2002 10:22:05 UTC