- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:13:51 -0700
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > Sent: 04 October 2002 17:50 > To: Martin Gudgin; WS-Desc WG (Public) > Subject: Re: importing docs in the same namespace > > > If we don't allow this the recommended usage style of > WSDL 1.1 no longer works. That basically said split the > interface part of the service to one file and the impl part > to another and import the interface part there - which still > seems like the natural and correct split. You could use XInclude to do that, I think we talked about that approach in Paris. Or we could define a wsdl:include with the same semantics as xsd:include ( sans chameleon include, probably ) ( I know we already decided not to define wsdl:include). > > So, I believe this should be another case of how > we diverge from XSD import semantics. Apart from requiring schemaLocation what are the other cases where we diverge? Gudge
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 13:14:22 UTC