- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:11:25 +0200
- To: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
This does sound very much like issue 49 [1]. Jean-Jacques. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x49 Prasad Yendluri wrote: > Not sure if we have an issue open to capture the schema issues but, one > example I noticed is: > > The SOAP binding section makes <soap:body> a required EII and > <soap:header> and <soap:headefault> optional EIIs that can also occur > > 1 times: > > <soap:body parts="nmtokens"? use="literal|encoded" > encodingStyle="uri-list"? namespace="uri"?> > > <soap:header message="qname" part="nmtoken" > use="literal|encoded" > encodingStyle="uri-list"? namespace="uri"?>* > > <soap:headerfault message="qname" part="nmtoken" > use="literal|encoded" > encodingStyle="uri-list"? > namespace="uri"?/>* > > Where as the schema neither the one in the spec [1] nor the one at [2] > capture these constraints. > > [1] http://www.w3c.org/tr/wsdl > [2] http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap > > Regards, Prasad
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 05:11:57 UTC