Re: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition>

+1 on removing definitions/@name

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

 > 
 > This is somewhat related to the "targetNamespace" issue that Gudge
 > posted about.
 > 
 > <issue id="issue-remove-optional-name-of-definition">
 >   <head>Should we remove the optional name attribute of
 >   &lt;definitions&gt;?</head>
 > 
 >   WSDL 1.1 has an optional attribute on definitions which is defined
 >   as being used to provide a lightweight form of documentation. I would
 >   like to remove that as its not clear that that has been useful or 
 >   used.
 >   <source>Sanjiva Weerwarana</source>
 > </issue>
 > 
 > Can we get consensus on removing this? I haven't seen any real use
 > of this attribute so far.
 > 
 > Sanjiva.
 >

Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 13:18:08 UTC