W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2002

Re: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition>

From: <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:37:16 -0400
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF4F5F2BB2.B19B5FE5-ON85256BE3.0055C8EA@us.ibm.com>
+1, name of definition is a useless annoyance

Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
Emerging Technologies

                      Weerawarana"             To:       "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>                                  
                      <sanjiva@watson.         cc:                                                                                     
                      ibm.com>                 Subject:  issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition>                              
                      Sent by: www-ws-                                                                                                 
                      06/25/2002 11:30                                                                                                 

This is somewhat related to the "targetNamespace" issue that Gudge
posted about.

<issue id="issue-remove-optional-name-of-definition">
  <head>Should we remove the optional name attribute of

  WSDL 1.1 has an optional attribute on definitions which is defined
  as being used to provide a lightweight form of documentation. I would
  like to remove that as its not clear that that has been useful or
  <source>Sanjiva Weerwarana</source>

Can we get consensus on removing this? I haven't seen any real use
of this attribute so far.


(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)

(image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif)

Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 11:37:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:24 UTC