- From: <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:37:16 -0400
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF4F5F2BB2.B19B5FE5-ON85256BE3.0055C8EA@us.ibm.com>
+1, name of definition is a useless annoyance
++++++++
Steve Graham
sggraham@us.ibm.com
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
Emerging Technologies
++++++++
"Sanjiva
Weerawarana" To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
<sanjiva@watson. cc:
ibm.com> Subject: issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition>
Sent by: www-ws-
desc-request@w3.
org
06/25/2002 11:30
AM
This is somewhat related to the "targetNamespace" issue that Gudge
posted about.
<issue id="issue-remove-optional-name-of-definition">
<head>Should we remove the optional name attribute of
<definitions>?</head>
WSDL 1.1 has an optional attribute on definitions which is defined
as being used to provide a lightweight form of documentation. I would
like to remove that as its not clear that that has been useful or
used.
<source>Sanjiva Weerwarana</source>
</issue>
Can we get consensus on removing this? I haven't seen any real use
of this attribute so far.
Sanjiva.
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 11:37:30 UTC