- From: Steve Tuecke <tuecke@mcs.anl.gov>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 03:15:16 -0500
- To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
At 01:48 PM 6/10/2002, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > > That type is indicated by inserting the following required > > declaration: > > > > > > <implements serviceType="qname"/> > > > > ... however I don't think we can require the wsdl:implement > > element to be always present. For example, the WSDL file may only > > contain an abstract service declaration, which is refined and > > implemented in a second WSDL file. I think wsld:implement should > > be optional unless there is a concrete service definition (i.e. > > binding), in which case it should be mandatory. > >Oh yes, good point! Might this be resolved by moving the wsdl:implements element to live within the wsdl:service element, instead of within the wsdl:description element, and make wsdl:implements required for all wsdl:service elements? -Steve
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 04:16:12 UTC