- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 09:29:13 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Mon June 10 9AM [09:00] Introductions and logistics [09:20] Publication plan Input: The current draft of the specification. Output: A list of issues to resolve prior to first publication (e.g. what namespace?), an expected publication date. [10:00] Break [10:20] Issues [12:00] Lunch [13:00] Abstract Model Input: Presentation/Proposal by AMTF (Jacek): What is the value of an Abstract Model? Output: Decision on whether to pursue an Abstract Model, and a joint understanding of the form such an Abstract Model should take. [14:30] Break [15:00] Issues [17:00] Adjourn Tue June 11 9AM [09:00] Requirements Input: Current requirements document, especially the few remaining draft requirements; public comments; WSArch comments. Output: Resolution of all outstanding issues and comments, plan for next publication. [10:00] Break [10:20] Requirements continued. [12:00] Lunch [13:00] Issues [14:30] Break [15:00] Issues [16:45] Break [17:00] (Optional) Visit to Echangeur Laboratory of new technology [18:00] Adjourn Wed June 12 [09:00] Begin joint session with WS Architecture group [09:00] Introductions, logistics [09:20] Update on state of the Architecture group [09:40] Update on state of the Description group [10:00] Break [10:20] Usage Scenarios Input: Presentation/Proposal by USTF: What is a Usage Scenario, what is a Use Case? Output: Joint approval of where the line between Usage Scenario and Use Case falls. [11:20] Requirements Input: WSA comments on WSD requirements (ASAP), WSD response to WSA input. Output: Resolution of WSA comments allowing re-publication of WSD requirements, joint understanding of the overlap of WSD and WSA requirements. [12:00] Lunch [13:00] End joint session [13:00] Issues [14:30] Break [15:00] Issues [17:00] Adjourn -------------------- Requirements Issues: -------------------- 1. Draft items in current requirements doc ------------------------------------------ http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-desc-reqs-20020429/ 1a. R042 [Draft] The description language SHOULD allow deriving one Interface from another by extension of the logical group of Messages. (From JS.) 1b. R121 [Draft] The description language SHOULD be able to be easily integrated into other markup languages. This may involve the following types of considerations: media types [IETF RFC 2046]: which should be used for a compound type, schema wildcarding in the host markup language, containment semantics: how the interpretation of WSDL is affected by different containing elements, fragment identifiers: how references that cross namespace boundaries work. (From MB.) 1c. R120 [Draft] The description language SHOULD ensure that all conceptual elements in the description of Messages are addressable by a URI reference [RFC2396]. (From the Semantic Web. Added 11 April, 2002. Awaiting clarification from RDF.) 2.Comments on the draft ----------------------- 2a. Editorial? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2002Apr/0001 .html 2b. Support for call flow http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2002Apr/0003 .html 3. Arch comments ---------------- hopefully forthcoming ------------ Spec Issues: ------------ 1. Extensibility issues ----------------------- 1a. Issue: Extensibility/Open Content Model Proposal from Glen 1b. Issue: portType extensibility. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0075.html Evaluate whether this is covered by our general extensibility mechanism. 2. MEP issues ------------- 2a. Issue: Extensible message exchange patterns http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0271.html 2b. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html 2c. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations Proposal from Jeffrey. 3. Service Type issues ---------------------- 3a. Issue: service type. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0002.html 4. Infoset issues ----------------- 4a. Should WSDL be infoset-based or not? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0236.html 5. Publication issues --------------------- 5a. Spec title 5b. Namespace
Received on Friday, 7 June 2002 12:29:24 UTC