- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 09:29:13 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Mon June 10 9AM
[09:00] Introductions and logistics
[09:20] Publication plan
Input: The current draft of the specification.
Output: A list of issues to resolve prior to first publication
(e.g. what namespace?), an expected publication date.
[10:00] Break
[10:20] Issues
[12:00] Lunch
[13:00] Abstract Model
Input: Presentation/Proposal by AMTF (Jacek): What is the
value of an Abstract Model?
Output: Decision on whether to pursue an Abstract Model, and a
joint understanding of the form such an Abstract Model
should take.
[14:30] Break
[15:00] Issues
[17:00] Adjourn
Tue June 11 9AM
[09:00] Requirements
Input: Current requirements document, especially the few
remaining draft requirements; public comments; WSArch
comments.
Output: Resolution of all outstanding issues and comments,
plan for next publication.
[10:00] Break
[10:20] Requirements continued.
[12:00] Lunch
[13:00] Issues
[14:30] Break
[15:00] Issues
[16:45] Break
[17:00] (Optional) Visit to Echangeur Laboratory of new technology
[18:00] Adjourn
Wed June 12
[09:00] Begin joint session with WS Architecture group
[09:00] Introductions, logistics
[09:20] Update on state of the Architecture group
[09:40] Update on state of the Description group
[10:00] Break
[10:20] Usage Scenarios
Input: Presentation/Proposal by USTF: What is a Usage
Scenario, what is a Use Case?
Output: Joint approval of where the line between Usage
Scenario and Use Case falls.
[11:20] Requirements
Input: WSA comments on WSD requirements (ASAP), WSD response
to WSA input.
Output: Resolution of WSA comments allowing re-publication of
WSD requirements, joint understanding of the overlap of
WSD and WSA requirements.
[12:00] Lunch
[13:00] End joint session
[13:00] Issues
[14:30] Break
[15:00] Issues
[17:00] Adjourn
--------------------
Requirements Issues:
--------------------
1. Draft items in current requirements doc
------------------------------------------
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-desc-reqs-20020429/
1a. R042
[Draft] The description language SHOULD allow deriving one Interface
from another by extension of the logical group of Messages. (From JS.)
1b. R121
[Draft] The description language SHOULD be able to be easily integrated
into other markup languages. This may involve the following types of
considerations: media types [IETF RFC 2046]: which should be used for a
compound type, schema wildcarding in the host markup language,
containment semantics: how the interpretation of WSDL is affected by
different containing elements, fragment identifiers: how references that
cross namespace boundaries work. (From MB.)
1c. R120
[Draft] The description language SHOULD ensure that all conceptual
elements in the description of Messages are addressable by a URI
reference [RFC2396]. (From the Semantic Web. Added 11 April, 2002.
Awaiting clarification from RDF.)
2.Comments on the draft
-----------------------
2a. Editorial?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2002Apr/0001
.html
2b. Support for call flow
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2002Apr/0003
.html
3. Arch comments
----------------
hopefully forthcoming
------------
Spec Issues:
------------
1. Extensibility issues
-----------------------
1a. Issue: Extensibility/Open Content Model
Proposal from Glen
1b. Issue: portType extensibility.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0075.html
Evaluate whether this is covered by our general extensibility
mechanism.
2. MEP issues
-------------
2a. Issue: Extensible message exchange patterns
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0271.html
2b. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html
2c. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations
Proposal from Jeffrey.
3. Service Type issues
----------------------
3a. Issue: service type.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0002.html
4. Infoset issues
-----------------
4a. Should WSDL be infoset-based or not?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0236.html
5. Publication issues
---------------------
5a. Spec title
5b. Namespace
Received on Friday, 7 June 2002 12:29:24 UTC