- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 10:34:53 -0400
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, Matt Long <mlong@phalanxsys.com>
- Cc: "'WS-Desc WG (Public)'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
That sounds like a HUGE problem. It would be horrible if one couldn't identify the service just by a URI. At 04:49 PM 6/5/2002 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote: > Matt, one of the issues is that you cannot just pass a URL as a >pointer to a service, you need the service QName, too. And the >QName by itself is not sufficient either because you may not know >where a WSDL definition of that QName is located. > > Jacek Kopecky > > Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation > http://www.systinet.com/ > > > >On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Matt Long wrote: > > > > > What issues(s) do multi-service WSDLs present? > > > > > > -Matt Long > > Phalanx Systems, LLC > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] > > On > > > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:47 PM > > > To: WS-Desc WG (Public) > > > Subject: Fw: issue: service type > > > > > > > > > I posted this a while back, but there was literally no discussion > > > that I can recall. Is this issue so boring?? > > > > > > Also related is the following: > > > <issue id="issue-multiple-services"> > > > <head>Should a single WSDL file only define one service?</head> > > > WSDL 1.1 suppports having multiple services in a single WSDL > > > file. This has caused confusion amongst users. > > > <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> > > > </issue> > > > > > > Anyone with opinions or can I resolve it myself? ;-) > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> > > > To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:29 AM > > > Subject: issue: service type > > > > > > > > > > I would like to open discussion on the following issue: > > > > > > > > <issue id="issue-service-type"> > > > > <head>Should we have an abstract view of a service?</head> > > > > WSDL defines a service as a collection of ports, but there is no > > > > abstract analog. > > > > <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> > > > > </issue> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > > -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 10:33:53 UTC