RE: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns

Sanjiva wrote:
>I assume that you guys are cool with the arbitrary MEPs being
>defined using extensibility in WSDL; yes? If so +1.

Yes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 6:55 AM
To: Jeffrey Schlimmer; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Glen Daniels
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns

I assume that you guys are cool with the arbitrary MEPs being
defined using extensibility in WSDL; yes? If so +1.

If not this is a hard problem- basically you're asking for
WSDL to become a meta-MEP language. I don't think that's a
trivial problem to solve.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>; "Glen Daniels"
<gdaniels@macromedia.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns


>
> Jean-Jacques wrote:
> >I think it would be desirable that these other MEPs can be
> >described in WSDL, otherwise there will be services out there
> >that cannot be described (and hence used).  It would be desirable
> >if these other MEPs can be described without us reopening the
> >whole spec every time.
>
> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:32 AM
> To: Glen Daniels
> Cc: 'www-ws-desc@w3.org'
> Subject: Re: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns
>
>
> +1 to Glen.
>
> BTW Glen, you may not have read [1].
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0227.html

Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 10:05:35 UTC