W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2002

Resolved WSDL issues, 10 July 2002

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:15:43 -0700
Message-ID: <330564469BFEC046B84E591EB3D4D59C06CCA76A@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <simon@zaks.demon.co.uk>, "Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com>, <gisle@activestate.com>, "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, <davec@progress.com>, <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, "Prasad Yendluri" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

The following issues were resolved by the WSDL WG this week:

    issue-intra-port-relationship: Should intra-port relationships be
      allowed? (reopened and re-resolved).  Source: Prasad Yendluri?

    #4: Namespaces. Source: Simon Fell

The following issues were reviewed and confirmed to be editorial in
nature and referred directly to the editors to implement.

    #7: xsd:binary in example.  Source: Simon Fell.
    #8: Grammar for Attribute Extensibility. Source: Kevin Liu
    #9: Example 1 type. Source: Gisle Aas
    #10: Example 3 element order bug.  Source: Gisle Aas
    #11: <import> grammar.  Source: Gisle Aas
    #12: <part> name attribute.  Source: Gisle Aas
    #13: Parameter Order missing from schema.  Source: Jacek Kopecky
    #16: Binding operations in portType. Source: Simon Fell
    #19: soap:headerfault optional?  Source: David Cleary
    #20: <soap:header> 'part' or 'parts' attribute?  Source: David
    #22: Specification not XML Infoset based.  Source: Jean-Jacques
    #38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where.
         Arthur Ryman
    #43: Does order matter for the child elements of "definitions"?
         Kevin Liu
    #44: "name" attribute of "soap:fault" is not defined in schema.
         Kevin Liu
    #45: "use" attribute of "fault" should be optional.  Source: Kevin
    #46: "transport" attribute of "soap:binding" should be optional.
         Source: Kevin Liu
    #47: "soap:operation" should be optional.  Source: Kevin Liu
    #48: "use" attribute of "soap:body" should be optional.  Source: 
         Kevin Liu
    #49: Inconsistency in "soap:header" specification.  Source: Kevin
    #59: MIME Binding permits 0 parts in multipart/related.  Source: 
         Prasad Yendluri
    #60: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts.
         Prasad Yendluri

For details of the resolution, please check the minutes [1] or
eventually the issues list [2].  Links to related threads may be found
in the agenda for the telcon [3].

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0074.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0055.html
Received on Friday, 12 July 2002 15:16:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:24 UTC