RE: Reference requirements

+1

Regards,
Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@prescod.net]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:07 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: Reference requirements


Nirmal Mukhi wrote:
> 
> ... I'm thinking it would be useful to be able to say in the message
> definition "part foo will be a service reference for a service that
> supports port types A, B and C". This would allow things like static
> generation of stubs on the client side so it can use the service reference
> when it comes in, and just makes the proposal more complete.

Right, that's what I was asking for in the beginning and why I think it
is really a WSDL issue more than anything else.

 Paul Prescod

Received on Monday, 25 February 2002 20:34:35 UTC