- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 02:27:12 +0100 (CET)
- To: Nirmal Mukhi <nmukhi@us.ibm.com>, Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Nirmal, Paul,
right now we have untyped remote references, that's correct.
We agree that typed remote references would be even more useful
and we are working on that. I still don't think this
functionality should be integrated into WSDL in any version
thereof.
Best regards,
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
http://www.systinet.com/
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Nirmal Mukhi wrote:
>
> Hello Jacek,
>
> I like your proposal; I have one question: how do you declare in a WSDL
> that a message contains a remote reference to a web service? The WASP
> documentation says that if a message part contains a remote reference, it
> will be of type http://idoox.com/interface:serviceReference...is that
> correct? I think we need something better - with the current scheme there
> is no way for a client to know by looking at the WSDL exactly what kind of
> service reference is exchanged, until it actually receives the service
> reference. I'm thinking it would be useful to be able to say in the message
> definition "part foo will be a service reference for a service that
> supports port types A, B and C". This would allow things like static
> generation of stubs on the client side so it can use the service reference
> when it comes in, and just makes the proposal more complete.
>
> Thanks,
> Nirmal.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Paul Prescod wrote:
> Nirmal Mukhi wrote:
> >
> > ... I'm thinking it would be useful to be able to say in the message
> > definition "part foo will be a service reference for a service that
> > supports port types A, B and C". This would allow things like static
> > generation of stubs on the client side so it can use the service reference
> > when it comes in, and just makes the proposal more complete.
>
> Right, that's what I was asking for in the beginning and why I think it
> is really a WSDL issue more than anything else.
>
> Paul Prescod
>
Received on Friday, 22 February 2002 20:27:14 UTC