- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 02:27:12 +0100 (CET)
- To: Nirmal Mukhi <nmukhi@us.ibm.com>, Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Nirmal, Paul, right now we have untyped remote references, that's correct. We agree that typed remote references would be even more useful and we are working on that. I still don't think this functionality should be integrated into WSDL in any version thereof. Best regards, Jacek Kopecky Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) http://www.systinet.com/ On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Nirmal Mukhi wrote: > > Hello Jacek, > > I like your proposal; I have one question: how do you declare in a WSDL > that a message contains a remote reference to a web service? The WASP > documentation says that if a message part contains a remote reference, it > will be of type http://idoox.com/interface:serviceReference...is that > correct? I think we need something better - with the current scheme there > is no way for a client to know by looking at the WSDL exactly what kind of > service reference is exchanged, until it actually receives the service > reference. I'm thinking it would be useful to be able to say in the message > definition "part foo will be a service reference for a service that > supports port types A, B and C". This would allow things like static > generation of stubs on the client side so it can use the service reference > when it comes in, and just makes the proposal more complete. > > Thanks, > Nirmal. On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Paul Prescod wrote: > Nirmal Mukhi wrote: > > > > ... I'm thinking it would be useful to be able to say in the message > > definition "part foo will be a service reference for a service that > > supports port types A, B and C". This would allow things like static > > generation of stubs on the client side so it can use the service reference > > when it comes in, and just makes the proposal more complete. > > Right, that's what I was asking for in the beginning and why I think it > is really a WSDL issue more than anything else. > > Paul Prescod >
Received on Friday, 22 February 2002 20:27:14 UTC