- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 20:37:56 -0400
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- CC: www-ws-cg@w3.org
Yes, I think this will work well. Thanks! Chris Jonathan Marsh wrote: > Chris, > > I understand that the Architecture group has formed or is forming a > sub-committee or task force on Usage Scenarios. Earlier we had planned > to have some sort of a joint task force between Arch and Desc to > coordinate Usage Scenarios. It sounds like now is a good time to get > down to specifics. > > Thinking it might be appropriate to nominate a few members of the > Description group for a joint task force, we asked for volunteers. The > volunteers were Sandeep Kumar, Jeff Mischkinsky, Igor Sedukhin, and (we > are hoping) Waqar Sadiq. Sandeep and Waqar are also the editors of our > Usage Scenarios (eventually to be Use Cases) document. Fortunately all > of these volunteers are also members of the Architecture group, which > simplifies logistics significantly. > > I propose that these volunteers participate in your Usage Scenarios task > force with a role of WS Desc WG joint task force members (without > prejudicing whether they have other roles as well.) > > These members will be responsible for representing the views of the Desc > WG, and communicating progress back to the WG. There is apparently no > need for the WGs to jointly approve the work of the task force. For > Usage Scenarios, we had already agreed that the Arch group would "own" > the document, and our feedback would be informally through our joint > task force participation and formally through WG-to-WG comments. For > the Description Use Cases document, we would "own" that document and the > Architecture groups feedback would similarly be informally through joint > task force participation, and formally through WG-to-WG comments. > > Do you think this plan meets the needs and expectations of the > Architecture Group? > > >
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2002 20:40:41 UTC