- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:16:25 -0700
- To: "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-cg@w3.org>
Chris, I understand that the Architecture group has formed or is forming a sub-committee or task force on Usage Scenarios. Earlier we had planned to have some sort of a joint task force between Arch and Desc to coordinate Usage Scenarios. It sounds like now is a good time to get down to specifics. Thinking it might be appropriate to nominate a few members of the Description group for a joint task force, we asked for volunteers. The volunteers were Sandeep Kumar, Jeff Mischkinsky, Igor Sedukhin, and (we are hoping) Waqar Sadiq. Sandeep and Waqar are also the editors of our Usage Scenarios (eventually to be Use Cases) document. Fortunately all of these volunteers are also members of the Architecture group, which simplifies logistics significantly. I propose that these volunteers participate in your Usage Scenarios task force with a role of WS Desc WG joint task force members (without prejudicing whether they have other roles as well.) These members will be responsible for representing the views of the Desc WG, and communicating progress back to the WG. There is apparently no need for the WGs to jointly approve the work of the task force. For Usage Scenarios, we had already agreed that the Arch group would "own" the document, and our feedback would be informally through our joint task force participation and formally through WG-to-WG comments. For the Description Use Cases document, we would "own" that document and the Architecture groups feedback would similarly be informally through joint task force participation, and formally through WG-to-WG comments. Do you think this plan meets the needs and expectations of the Architecture Group?
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2002 19:16:27 UTC