- From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:33:56 -0800
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
This discussion was about the idea that the grid is not a relevant case, and we could get away with saying that Web services only implement SOA. I brought up the grid issue just to say that your original text should not be changed. Ugo > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Champion, Mike > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 4:27 PM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] > > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:23 PM > > To: Bijan Parsia; www-ws-arch@w3.org > > Subject: RE: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6 > > > > > > Also look at the grid discussion in > > http://www.sys-con.com/webservices/article.cfm?id=706 . > > I've lost track -- does this discussion of the Grid entail > changes to the > text I proposed? If the bottom line is "web services can be used to > implement OO as well as SOA architectures", I'm pretty sure I > stated that > clearly. No? > >
Received on Monday, 12 January 2004 19:33:59 UTC