- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:31:28 -0500
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:22:29PM -0500, Champion, Mike wrote: > > Don't forget "interface constraints", at least for part of > > the problem. > > I'm not sure what you mean. I just meant that interface constraints help address the "issue that semantics has to be shared as well as message syntax to get real interoperability" (your words). I was recommending that it be added to the list at the end of; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2004Jan/0017.html > I guess since I asked Katia to draft a > paragraph on what the WS/SW loose end is, I could ask you to draft a similar > paragraph about the loose end involving WS and the RESTful Web. I think it's a good idea for somebody to do this, but I doubt anything I had to say on the matter would be acceptable to the WG. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2004 22:32:07 UTC