- From: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:26:04 -0500
- To: 'Mark Baker' <distobj@acm.org>, "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Mike and Mark, I agree with both. I will try to draft some text for next week. --Katia -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Baker Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:10 PM To: Champion, Mike Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Re: WS Architectural Loose Ends / Outstanding issues Don't forget "interface constraints", at least for part of the problem. On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:48:41PM -0500, Champion, Mike wrote: > I see off the top of my head would be: > > - human readable documentation > - informal taxonomies/glossaries > - formal ontologies, either published by the provider or standardized within > an industry > - other taxonomy mapping approaches, a la Contivo? [Hi Dave] > - ??? Other AI-ish things ??? -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2004 14:26:56 UTC