- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:56:29 -0600
- To: Art.Barstow@nokia.com, w3c-ac-forum@w3.org
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Hmmmm. We went through the Requirements doc and discussed each deliverable there, but I don't recall doing the same exercise with the charter itself. I guess we sort of thought that the Requirements doc was a reification of the charter, or something like that. Probably we should have done the exercise with the charter itself, too, but ... Oh well. I can't answer for the WG, but I think that the statement in question was probably understood in a fairly general sense -- that the architecture itself was to be, by its nature, the roadmap in question. Of course, the "maintaining" part is not deliverable without a WG, but that's another story. Note that the statement occurs in the section about coordination with other groups. That section more or less says that the coordination group will use the architecture document as a guide for its activities. It then says, in the statement you quote, more or less that input from other groups will be paid attention to in the creation of that architecture. At least that's the way I read it. "Coordination goes both ways", more or less. If that is a valid reading, then let me promise you that input from other groups got a LOT of attention in the WSA, particularly WSDL and XML Protocol. I don't think that at any time in the lifetime of the WG was there an understanding, or even an opinion expressed, that we were supposed to be developing a roadmap in the sense of "First somebody needs to write a spec to do X, then after that somebody else will build on that with specs that do Y and Z". The closest we came to an understanding of that sort was our role of identifying gaps that other WG's might work on and to propose such WG's, a function which we did put considerable effort into. Those activities, however, were not reported on directly in the document, other than the various "issues" raised as to questions that need to be answered and are not answered (see http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-arch-20040211/#unresolved_issues for links to such discussions). -----Original Message----- From: Art.Barstow@nokia.com [mailto:Art.Barstow@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:54 PM To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler); w3c-ac-forum@w3.org Subject: RE: Web Services Architecture documents published Thanks for the info Roger. The WSA WG's charter [1] says the WG will be create a roadmap: [[ The Web Services Architecture Working Group will be developing and maintaining a roadmap. Input gathered at the Coordination Group level will be used to provide such a deliverable. ]] Would someone please tell me where I can find that deliverable? Thanks, Art Barstow --- [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-arch-charter > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-ac-forum-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-ac-forum-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of ext Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 3:09 PM > To: w3c-ac-forum@w3.org > Subject: FW: Web Services Architecture documents published > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of David Booth > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:37 PM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Cc: Hugo Haas; Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com; Dave Hollander > Subject: Web Services Architecture documents published > > > > I am please to inform you all that the following Working Group Notes > from the Web Services Architecture working group have been published. > > The main WS Architecture document: > > >- NOTE "Web Services Architecture" > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-arch-20040211/ > > Supporting documents: > > >- NOTE "Web Services Glossary" > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/ > > > >- NOTE "Web Services Architecture Requirements" > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-wsa-reqs-20040211/ > > > >- NOTE "Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios" > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-arch-scenarios-20040211/ > > Additional material produced by the Management Task Force of this > working > group: > > >- NOTE "Web Service Management: Service Life Cycle" > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-wslc-20040211/ > > Congratulations to all in the working group, and thanks especially to > those who contributed so much to produce them! > > > -- > David Booth > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273 > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2004 16:57:12 UTC