- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:53:55 -0500
- To: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Cc: "He, Hao" <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, Josh Sled <jsled@asynchronous.org>, "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>, Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:54:04AM -0000, Jim Webber wrote: > > Hao: > > > I would argue that the reason you want to limit the number of > > verbs is that we are consuming services. > > Fine. I can reduce the number of verbs from my original two (SEND and > RECEIVE) to just one (SEND). That certainly seems like the minimum I can > get away with, can the REST approach do any better :-) If you hit "send", "receive", or "invoke", you've gone too far; you're no longer at the application layer. The uniform interface is as far as you can generalize application semantics, by *definition*. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 22:54:28 UTC