- From: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:27:33 -0500
- To: '''www-ws-arch@w3.org ' ' ' <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
On Feb 6, 2004, at 3:11 PM, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: > Then, if a REST style is fine, are you only objecting to the native > use of the HTTP protocol (vs SOAP tunneled through whatever)? > I'm not objecting to anything other than the notion there is One True Way to do any of this. REST has a place, SOAP/WSDL has a place, SOAP-RPC has a place (albeit mainly in well-managed enterprise environments). I'm just a bit mystified by Mark's repeated queries for clarification on why WSA doesn't build on a REST and only REST foundation. That's the issue that I *think* was originally being asked in this thread, and I think is very thoroughly answered in the WSA Note and (extensively!) in the www-ws-arch archives.
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 15:27:54 UTC