- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:45:28 -0400
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) > [mailto:RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com] > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 5:55 PM > To: Champion, Mike; www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: Web services: Meet the new boss; same as the old boss ??? > > I think this is actually a pretty good article -- I can't > imagine why you think it is inflammatory. Seems pretty > accurate to me. Well, I didn't say it wasn't accurate :-) Just that the authors (or more likely the editors) went out of their way to get in some zingers, like the "meet the new boss; same as the old boss" line, and various cracks about how WS were supposed to be simple but seem to be making the megaconsultancies the happiest. Some people (especially those from IBM) might take it as a bit of an attack, so I was just warning people to look at the substance not the tone. The major implication I draw is what many people have been saying for the last 6 months -- that WS are most effective in the context of an SOA rather than as an ad hoc integration strategy. I agree that this is a bit out of scope for us, except that to some extent our job is to help set rational expectations for what WS can really do, irrespective of the hype a couple of years ago. I think we *are* moving toward treating SOA as a first class citizen in the WSA, so if anything this just might reinforce our resolve to do that. > Within a company like ours Web service > architecture has to do with stuff that at the W3C level would > be dismissed fairly casually as implementation detail and/or > best practices. Good point!
Received on Monday, 8 September 2003 18:55:06 UTC