- From: Anders W. Tell <opensource@toolsmiths.se>
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 23:37:13 +0200
- To: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Francis, There is difference between prescribed mesage path and actual message path (runtime), both may be of interest. Is this something that fits into the model ? /anders Francis McCabe wrote: > This diagram represents an attempt to partially refactor the Message > Oriented Model. > > The essential difference here is to bring out that messages have > originators and ultimate recipients as well as senders and receivers; > and the structure of the message is closer to the SOAP model. > > It also brings out the role of the message transport a little more > clearly. > > Some notes: > > 1. Originator and ultimate recipient of a message are really > service-oriented concepts. > 2. Correlation is a general concept, that applies elsewhere. The > general version of this is `counts-as' (as in this message counts as > the reply to your earlier message). > 3. What is not captured here is the idea of a message processing > model. Is that necessary? It should be covered to some extent in the > written text > > Comments would be welcome > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 17:37:34 UTC