- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:57:38 -0500
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
No, thanks for straightening me out. The funny thing is -- I sort of thought I remembered it becoming rec, but I went to the XMLP home page in the W3C Web site and clicked around quite a bit in search of a simple status statement, and I could never find one nor anything clearly saying it is really a Rec. So I figured it wasn't. The people who maintain that page might, in my view, want to put something up front that clarifies this. Or did my eye just pass over something REALLY obvious? -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:33 AM To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Re: Standards Descriptions Hmm... I'm sure you're aware it's been a Recommendation for a little while now? ;-) JJ. Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote: > SOAP 1.2_ <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part0-20030624/> is > being developed in the W3C and is in the latter stages of the > process. It does not seem likely that SOAP 1.2 will be particularly > controversial and major vendors will probably implement it quickly > once it becomes a recommendation.
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2003 09:58:00 UTC