- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:58:15 -0500
- To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Hi Ugo, On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:27:52AM -0800, Ugo Corda wrote: > Mark, > > > > 3a. In effect, is an address that is used by a transport mechanism part > > > of the message or not? > > > > Yes, and I believe that holds for both application and transport > > protocols. So not only is the URI to which a SOAP envelope is POSTed > > part of the message, but so are the IP and MAC addresses (at least in > > the HTTP/TCP/Ethernet case). > > Which address are we talking about? Is it the address of the ultimate receiver? Is it the address of an intermediary as expressed in a SOAP header? Is it the address of an intermediary interposed by a transparent proxy (so that is actually different than the HTTP address itself)? Yes. 8-) All addresses impact the meaning of a message. My point is simply that not all of them are in the SOAP envelope, and that's OK. Mark.
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 12:55:45 UTC