RE: FYI: synch/asynch def from WSRM TC from Champion, Mike on 2003-05-24 (www-ws-arch@w3.org from May 2003)

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 07:32:05 -0400
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E405C6E5F7@usmsg03.sagus.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) [mailto:RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 3:14 AM
To: Geoff Arnold; Ugo Corda
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: FYI: synch/asynch def from WSRM TC

 It appears that this group is perfectly happy to do so and I see no reason
in the world for them not to.

No, we agreed in Rennes that we can probably do better, recorded an issue to
revisit the definition, but assigned it a lower priority than getting the
core concepts and relationships nailed down.  Given that this is a
permatrout, doesn't that seem like a reasonable way forward?

Received on Saturday, 24 May 2003 07:32:21 UTC