-----Original Message----- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) [mailto:RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com] Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 3:14 AM To: Geoff Arnold; Ugo Corda Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: RE: FYI: synch/asynch def from WSRM TC It appears that this group is perfectly happy to do so and I see no reason in the world for them not to. No, we agreed in Rennes that we can probably do better, recorded an issue to revisit the definition, but assigned it a lower priority than getting the core concepts and relationships nailed down. Given that this is a permatrout, doesn't that seem like a reasonable way forward?Received on Saturday, 24 May 2003 07:32:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:52 UTC