RE: Separate concepts for "service" and "targetResource?" (was RE : /service/@targetResource ?) from Ugo Corda on 2003-05-22 (www-ws-arch@w3.org from May 2003)

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 07:36:47 -0700
To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC90811C4@MAIL01.stc.com>

>> WSDL seems like the wrong place to try to solve that problem.

> Whoh!  Sounds like a trout to fish for on www-ws or somehwere.  
> WSDL is a normative input to this WG.   If I'm missing something, please rephrase the
> question or comment in terms of the concepts and relationships of the WSA
> document.   The point of this thread is to tie the conceptual model of WSDL
> (especially the targetResource idea in the latest draft) to the
> concepts/relationships specified in the latest WSA working draft.  

I am confused. Are you saying that the role of WSA wrt other W3C Web services-related standard groups is limited to digesting their inputs without the possibly of criticizing them and providing feedback (except for some occasional F2F interactions)?

Ugo

Received on Thursday, 22 May 2003 10:36:54 UTC