- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 22:31:24 -0400
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Note that I have replied to Jim on www-ws@w3.org For topics not directly related to the WG's mandate, I recommend others do the same too. MB On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:24:45AM +0100, Jim Webber wrote: > Mark: > > > I like my lightbulb example. It's worked on two previous > > occasions to give folks epiphanies; > > > > GET on a URI returns "0" or "1" depending on the state of the > > bulb. PUT on that same URI with "0" turns the bulb off, "1" > > turns it on. > > This is a useful example, but I have to ask how I tell a lightbulb service > from something else. In the SOAP and WSDL view of the world, I can tell > where another service doesn't have the same interface as a lightbulb > service. Although I admit that I cannot understand how to use it without a > priori knowledge of its semantics (just like with the REST approach). > > Again, I would still like to see the code for this. While the interface > level sounds slightly lighter weight (assuming HTTP where you would use 1 > GET and 1 POST versus my 2 POSTs), how does the implementation of this > service compare to the SOA version? How would it be maintained over time? > > So, time to put up? :-) > > Jim -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis Actively seeking contract work or employment
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2003 22:28:39 UTC