- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 01:36:24 -0400
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: "'www-ws-arch@w3.org '" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 07:07:44AM -0600, Champion, Mike wrote: > Oh, I see the ambiguity in my response. Ah, gotcha. Thanks. > I invite people read the soon-to-be published WSA working draft and raise > any Webarch issues one thinks are in it, but we do NOT invite issues > concerning WSA's non-conformance with non-normative constraints on it. Well, as I know I've said before, I consider the only authority on Web architecture to be the Web itself. So if I can point at some constraint which is widely followed on the Web today, and demonstrate that Web services don't follow it, then that seems to me to be something that goes against the architecture, and therefore against the charter and requirements of the WG. Anyhow, IMO, this is all going to end up on the lap of the Director at some point no matter which path we take, so there's probably little use in discussing the "what" or "how". I'm interested in the "when". 8-) Are you planning to request review of the next revision of the arch doc by the TAG? MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis Actively seeking contract work or employment
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2003 01:34:19 UTC