RE: Proposed Venn Diagrams

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Denning [mailto:pauld@mitre.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 1:04 PM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Proposed Venn Diagrams
> 
> 
 >is).
> 
> In the WSAWG telecon, Frank talked about the "uses" 
> relationship, so C is a 
> constrained subset of D.
> 
> D can have lots of verbs, but C is limited to the "uniform" 
> set of verbs or 
> actions (ala REST).

Hmm, that's another way to look at this!  What do others think?   It makes
the "open" label on D appropriate, and alleviates the concern that "open" is
not the antonym of "uniform."

But C is a proper subset of the intersection of B and D, not D itself,
right?  And it's not simply the intersection of B and D because that's where
CGI hackery lives, I think.

OOoh, whoever suggested doing this with Venn diagrams should be given a
medal :-)  The Order of the Golden Trout!

Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 13:19:06 UTC