> -----Original Message----- > From: Geoff Arnold [mailto:Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM] > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:30 PM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Draft language on MEPs, synchronous, and asynchronous. > +1 Overall, especially to combining this with the MEP concept. Without that, we risk complicating the definition to exclude irrelevant senses of these terms. > MEPs which describe closely coupled, or lock-step > interactions are frequently referred to as "synchronous". How about "time-coupled" or "closely coupled in time"? "Coupling" has a lot of other meanings and I think we want to explicitly talk about timing-related coupling.... One wants to say "synchronized" of course, but that doesn't add any information!Received on Thursday, 1 May 2003 14:13:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:51 UTC