- From: Abbie Barbir <abbieb@nortelnetworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 10:18:22 -0500
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 10:18:44 UTC
Hi, this should fit well with security also. abbie -----Original Message----- From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:26 PM To: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: RE: Mapping Specs to the Architecture -----Original Message----- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) [mailto:RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:13 PM To: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Mapping Specs to the Architecture I had a chat with TimBL about the WS Arch work in which he asked a very interesting question. He wanted to know whether we were producing a diagram that would make clear what parts of the architecture currently have specs in place, what parts have specs in progress and what parts need specs but there is nothing in sight. I say that kind of thing in "elavator speeches" describing what we do, but I guess we've never really talked about it, made it a requirement, or put it in the document. Maybe it's time to do so :-) It would be a good cross-check tbat we cover the ground defined by all the specs out there, and would have good PR value.
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 10:18:44 UTC