- From: <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:30:25 -0600
- To: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
I had thought that this was intended to be part of the WSA Roadmap
document. We were planning on publishing such a document at one point, as I
recall.
Regards,
D-
"Champion, Mike"
<Mike.Champion@Software To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
AG-USA.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: Mapping Specs to the Architecture
www-ws-arch-request@w3.
org
03/10/2003 01:26 PM
-----Original Message-----
From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) [mailto:RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:13 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Mapping Specs to the Architecture
I had a chat with TimBL about the WS Arch work in which he asked a very
interesting question. He wanted to know whether we were producing a
diagram that would make clear what parts of the architecture currently
have specs in place, what parts have specs in progress and what parts need
specs but there is nothing in sight.
I say that kind of thing in "elavator speeches" describing what we do, but
I guess we've never really talked about it, made it a requirement, or put
it in the document. Maybe it's time to do so :-) It would be a good
cross-check tbat we cover the ground defined by all the specs out there,
and would have good PR value.
Received on Monday, 10 March 2003 15:30:58 UTC