RE: Appropriate topics for www-ws-arch (was RE: Visibility ...)

+1
abbie


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) 
> [mailto:RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 11:06 PM
> To: Champion, Mike; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Appropriate topics for www-ws-arch (was RE: 
> Visibility ...)
> 
> 
> 
> Agree totally with Mike's statement.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:27 PM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Appropriate topics for www-ws-arch (was RE: Visibility ...)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > You said it yourself, Web services are not the Web.  But 
> the Semantic
> > Web is the Web.  Like it or not, the W3C's job is to "Lead 
> the Web to 
> > its full potential".  I think it's pretty obvious what that means.
> 
> I very strongly believe that www-ws@w3.org is the appropriate 
> home for this and similar topics and would appreciate it 
> being moved there or somewhere
> else.   This list is where the WSA WG does its technical 
> work.  I assure
> all
> concerned that the work is subject to careful scrutiny by the 
> W3C team and management to ensure that we operate within the 
> framework of the charter approved by the W3C Advisory Committee.  
> 
> I expect that we will be cutting off tangential discussions 
> here in much the same way as the TAG has been forced to do on 
> their public list, in order to maintain a reasonable traffic 
> volume and focus.  Critique of WG draft documents is 
> welcomed, specific, realistic suggestions for improvement are 
> especially welcome.  
> 
> I confess that I have been too willing to chase trout down 
> rabbit holes myself (to mix our favorite metaphors!) but will 
> resolve to avoid the temptation in the future.  Appropriate 
> slaps with a large trout are appropriate if I backslide! 
> 
> 
> 
>