- From: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:59:21 -0700
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>, www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
How does using GET to *send* a message fit with the semantics of GET? Frank On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > Frank McCabe wrote on 06/27/2003 11:05:47 AM: > >> >> I would strongly suggest removing the references to using HTTP GET as >> a >> way of sending messages. Mark B is right on this one. If you want to >> use HTTP, the appropriate verb is POST. > > Hmmm... I'm fairly certain I disagree. > >> >> I suggest further that the plain XML reference is not one that has >> been >> endorsed by the group. Indeed I recall significant pushback on this >> one... > > +1 > >> >> Frank > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > phone: +1 508 234 3624 > >
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 17:00:11 UTC