RE: MEP text

Mark Jones wrote on 06/27/2003 12:46:47 PM:

> 
>    From: Dave Hollander <dmh@contivo.com>
>    To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>    Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:04:47 -0700
>    Subject: RE: MEP text
> 
>    Thanks Mark. 
> 
>    I have one big concern.
> 
>    > a message exchange pattern may be expressed
>    > in a choreography description language.
> 
>    I fear that this may end up in circular difinition.
>    I expect that Choreography will need to ground upon the definition 
>    MEP's. 
> 
> It would only be circular if we said that choreography was subsumed by
> MEPs, which it is not.  The way I see it, MEPs talk in terms of the
> messages exchanged at a a rather atomic binding/operation level.
> Choreography builds on the foundation that the MEPs provide.  Since

+1!


Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
phone: +1 508 234 3624

Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 16:34:38 UTC