- From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:49:38 -0800
- To: "Ricky Ho" <riho@cisco.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Last month I raised a similar issue, and I got an extensive response from David Burdett at [1], which you might want to look at. Ugo [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Dec/0095.html > -----Original Message----- > From: Ricky Ho [mailto:riho@cisco.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 7:50 AM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RM and Intermediaries > > > > Lets say S is the sender endpoint, R is the receiver > endpoint, and i1, i2 > are intermediaries that pre-process the message. > > S --> i1 --> i2 --> R > > Do i1 and i2 have to understand RM ? or RM is just an end-to-end > handshaking between S and R ? If so, can S pick a different > path in its > message resend ? > > Rgds, Ricky > >
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:50:15 UTC