- From: Christian Hoertnagl <hoe@zurich.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:01:35 +0100
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF19FFB1EA.DD9C08B8-ONC1256CAE.00356E02-C1256CAE.003713D0@ch.ibm.com>
Anne, Hao, I agree with Anne's reply indicating that the choice between RPC or document-style does not mandate a particular client programming style. The WSDL spec e.g. specifically says that "This information _may_ be used to select an appropriate programming model". However, while I understand that you can do document-style messaging using normal stubs, I'm also interested in scenarios where the messages have more variable format (an unknown number of documents, each with optional attachment, say) than is typical for RPC (three integer parameters, say). For handling sg. like this an approach with callback handlers (like Hao seems to indicate as well) seems like an attractive option to me. I'd be curious to learn more about existing approaches esp. of this kind. Regards, Christian Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au> wrote on 01/09/2003 01:55:14 AM: > We are using a strategy pattern in our implementation: you have a generic > reader which decomposes the document to various parts that can be handled by > various handlers. Perhaps this is similar to your handler as well? The > cool thing about this approach is that each handler only needs to under one > aspect of the document.
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 05:03:32 UTC