- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 12:02:26 -0800
- To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>, "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
hmmm. There are currently TAG elections underway for 3 of the 9 positions. Perhaps companies should think about this particular debate when voting for TAG members. I think it completely reasonable to ask the current TAG candidates what their respective position on this and other issues are, and to vote accordingly. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Mark Baker > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:24 AM > To: Champion, Mike > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding) > > > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 08:48:33AM -0700, Champion, Mike wrote: > > In my very humble and personal opinion, the "REST vs web services" > > permathread has made very little progress in its latest > incarnation. In my > > more paranoid moments, I wonder whether the point is to > distract us from all > > the other issues on the WSA WG agenda. > > It might look that way sometimes, but every time I bring this up I > delay your work, and it's not in my interest, as somebody who wants to > see this work reviewed by the TAG and Director ASAP, to do that. I do > it because I believe that intelligent people will respond to reasoned > argument, and also because I'm trying to prepare the WG not to be too > surprised when the TAG and/or Director reject its work (or > failing that, > when Web services *continue* to fail to be deployed in any significant > way on the Internet). > > Still, I think most of this discussion was good since it was directly > addressing issues, in particular 1, 5, and 21; > > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/issues/wsa-issues.html#x1 > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/issues/wsa-issues.html#x5 > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/issues/wsa-issues.html#x21 > > I'll continue the "binding" discussion with Miles because I do agree > with him that it's a key issue. It directly addresses issue one, > and indirectly addresses the other two. > > MB > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca > Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis > >
Received on Monday, 6 January 2003 15:03:09 UTC