- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:20:32 -0500
- To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Ok, now we just need to define "late binding". Just kidding!! 8-) I think that's a fine proposed solution, Roger. Big +1. On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:41:45AM -0600, Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote: > "The WG is not currently using the term "a priori information" in the > reference architecture, so we do not feel a need to come to an agreement > about the meaning of the term in general. In the specific context in > which it is used in the group charter, we understand it to mean "prior > information". We interpret this as a requirement that the architecture > support late binding." MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 15:17:22 UTC