- From: Mahan Michael (NRC/Boston) <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:44:55 -0500
- To: ext Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>, Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
I like both this diagram and Jean-Jacques' UML class diagram. There is a lot in common and these should be consolidated. I believe an ERD is more appropriate, so I would like to see some concepts in the class diagram migrate to the ERD. Specifically the MEP entity and possibly the Choreography entity. To make the update ERD less busy I would recommend removing the 'has' relationships between Service and the Interface and Semantics boxes. Those relationships are redundant given that Interface and Semantics are referred by the Description entity. I agree with the comment about Location and think that it is on a peer level with Interface and Semantics. Mike On 2/20/03 6:23 PM, "ext Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com> wrote: > Great diagram. > > Would it not be accurate to say that a service has an interface and a > location, rather than an interface having a location? After all, you can have > multiple services with the same interface at different locations. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On >> Behalf Of Francis McCabe >> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:59 PM >> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org >> Subject: Slightly updated diagram >> >> << File: pastedGraphic4.pdf >> >
Received on Friday, 21 February 2003 11:44:09 UTC