- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 14:38:48 -0500
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 8:17 AM > To: Anne Thomas Manes > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > > > We've had this discussion here, in other forms (i.e. "GET is > an application semantic"), so I don't expect us to come to > any agreement about this. A very safe bet :-) > If there's concensus in the WG > about what you've written, I would request that this be > reflected in the arch doc so that IETFers and other OSI/IETF > model folks can be aware of the difference in terminology. > Or perhaps it could just go in the glossary, in the > definitions of "application layer", "transport layer", etc.. There's nothing in the WSA charter or requirements about conforming to any flavor of the 7-layer networking model, AFAIK. I'm unfamiliar with the IETF's position on this as a normative model for the highest-levels of the protocol stack, could you point me to that? I'd also be interested in hearing from anyone besides Mark who believes this is an important issue. >
Received on Sunday, 16 February 2003 14:39:05 UTC