- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 19:26:03 -0500
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
[At first glance, this seems to pose some architectural issues that we may wish to state an opinion on. Or at least we should make sure that the WSA document/glossary/use cases has content that would be useful to "future generations" confronted with the question of how the WS description language could/should relate to HTTP and the Web method feature in SOAP. Thoughts, anyone?] -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:10 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org I took an ACTION to restart discussion on the HTTP binding issues. Most of the issues are about increasing the functionality available in the HTTP binding. Jeffrey did a great job of summarizing the issues and proposing dispositions [1] based on the principle of not increasing the functionality in the HTTP binding. His rationale is an obvious lack of interest in this functionality by the WG. I propose we first address this larger question of what scenarios we envision the HTTP binding being used in, and how expressive the binding need to be in order to satisfy the needs of those scenarios. Should we increase the expressive power of the HTTP binding? I will set aside time at this week's telcon to address this question. After we've reached some consensus on that question, the individual issues Jeffrey categorizes and proposes resolutions to [1] should proceed more quickly. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 19:26:16 UTC