- From: He, Hao <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:32:31 +1000
- To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 24 August 2003 18:32:35 UTC
Well, it appears to me that the author agrees with Geoff (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2003Aug/0060.html) and me (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2003Aug/0054.html). That is:"if ordering is important, it is sync. Otherwise, it is async.". Hao -----Original Message----- From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:57 AM To: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Book chapter on Synch/Asynch Those interested in the definition and architectural implications of "synchronous" and "asynchronous" web services might wish to look at http://www.rds.com/download-request.php?file=books/looselyCoupled/Chapter-09 -Async.pdf This is a free chapter of LOOSELY COUPLED by Doug Kaye http://www.rds.com/books/looselyCoupled/index.html
Received on Sunday, 24 August 2003 18:32:35 UTC