- From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 12:54:32 -0700
- To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- CC: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Actually "same channel" is mentioned in the WSDL Message Patterns Draft only in the context of request-response (where it makes sense). That is a means of correlation, but it is generally N/A for asynchronous interactions. --Jon Ugo Corda wrote: >>The problem is that WSDL MEPs are not connected with any concept of >>correlation, even an abstract one. > > > Well, the latest WSDL Message Patterns draft mentions a transport-level correlation mechanism (that's what "the same channel" seems to mean). Are you saying that the WSD group has decided not to touch that area at all (which could explain dropping the Request-Response MEP in favor of just In-Out)? > > That might be a proper decision for the WSD group, particularly in light of the time pressure it is under. On the other hand, if that group does not address it, other groups will, as you say (in addition to the ones you mention, BPEL has also its own way of dealing with it). The problem is, as usual, that those groups might introduce different concepts and mechanisms that, in the end, will not easily interoperate. > > Ugo > > >
Received on Monday, 4 August 2003 15:54:59 UTC