- From: Newcomer, Eric <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:24:59 -0400
- To: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, "Baker, Mark" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
The dilemma as I see it is that the pub repository is actually an ultimate destination, but the pub/sup MEP includes both the publish message interaction and the subscribe message interaction...and there isn't a definition of this type of "intermediary" in the SOAP spec. -----Original Message----- From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:33 PM To: Baker, Mark Cc: 'www-ws-arch@w3.org' Subject: RE: Intermediaries - various cases >It's a new message when it progresses any further, since the transfer contract with the sender has been fulfilled. But is it possible to objectively identify this transfer contract? In the case of the pub/sub node, the sender's contract might be fulfilled by its interaction with the pub/sub node (the pub/sub node is the ultimate receiver). Or I could see the ultimate delivery of the message to the subscribers as part of the sender's contract (the pub/sub node is just an intermediary). How is this going to be determined? Is it just something in the eye of the beholder? >Hmm, perhaps the SOAP 1.2 spec could be clearer. I completely agree with that. Ugo
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 16:25:35 UTC