Re: WSDL, app protocols, URI schemes

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:02:00AM -0700, David Orchard wrote:
> Mark,
> I look at it a bit more wholistically than just looking at what you call the
> methods.  To make a true comparison of wsdl documents to browser centric
> constructs, one also needs to include an html form and the html form
> encodings section.  So you are just looking at the "method", but I would
> like to look at all the data necessary to invoke a service.  Which includes
> methods and data formats.

I'm trying to compare apples to apples.  I have done that with WSDL
port types and HTTP methods, and with URI schemes and names of WSDL
documents.  While I'd be happy to go up the stack comparing other
things if you request, there is certainly no need to do so because
I've made my point.  You haven't offered any evidence that I'm
incorrect.  All you've done here is throw in pears, plums, and bananas,
which only serves to confuse things.

There are objects, identified by URIs, with methods, on a network; Web
services have custom methods, Web resource have generic ones.  What's
wrong with that?

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.     

Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 15:07:39 UTC